Susan
May 8th, 2006, 02:18 PM
Not sure where to put this... I don't expect it to get heated so the kitchen didn't seem right, and its not really political, but... anyway... if there's a better place then so be it. :)
Anyone read the recent article in Time magazine about roommaids? I looked on their site for a link but didn't see anything so you'll just have to live with my synopsis. :lol:
The article mentioned a growing trend, especially in expensive areas, of a new type of roommate. Rather than inviting someone to live in your home and share the rent/mortgage, people -- mostly men, are looking for "roommaids" -- usually female, to move in rent free and take over some domestic duties. They agree to the terms up front, but typically they make it clear that there are NO sexual or emotional strings attached, and the woman cooks for the guy, does some cleaning, maybe takes care of his dog if he travels for work, that kind of thing. She lives there rent-free, has her own life, many times her own job, etc.
They interviewed a woman in LA who has lived with several different guys under these circumstances and said it allows her to save a lot of money and live in way nicer places than she could otherwise afford.
Would you ever consider doing such a thing? Would you look down on someone who did? Women's rights activists, the article says, are up in arms about it because it reinforces the "traditional" roles of a woman cooking and cleaning. To me it just seems like a different way of hiring a maid or that type of thing.
Anyone read the recent article in Time magazine about roommaids? I looked on their site for a link but didn't see anything so you'll just have to live with my synopsis. :lol:
The article mentioned a growing trend, especially in expensive areas, of a new type of roommate. Rather than inviting someone to live in your home and share the rent/mortgage, people -- mostly men, are looking for "roommaids" -- usually female, to move in rent free and take over some domestic duties. They agree to the terms up front, but typically they make it clear that there are NO sexual or emotional strings attached, and the woman cooks for the guy, does some cleaning, maybe takes care of his dog if he travels for work, that kind of thing. She lives there rent-free, has her own life, many times her own job, etc.
They interviewed a woman in LA who has lived with several different guys under these circumstances and said it allows her to save a lot of money and live in way nicer places than she could otherwise afford.
Would you ever consider doing such a thing? Would you look down on someone who did? Women's rights activists, the article says, are up in arms about it because it reinforces the "traditional" roles of a woman cooking and cleaning. To me it just seems like a different way of hiring a maid or that type of thing.